Securitising the new Egypt: Partisan vs. revolutionary demands

Securitising the new Egypt: Partisan vs. revolutionary demands

Author: 
Stramer-Smith, Janicke
Place: 
Oxon
Publisher: 
Taylor & Francis Group
Date published: 
2021
Record type: 
Responsibility: 
Hartshorn, Ian M.
Journal Title: 
Journal of North African Studies
Source: 
Journal of North African Studies,Vol. 26, No. 6, 2021, pp. 1166-1189
ISSN: 
0305-7070
Abstract: 

How did workers' demands go from the mainstream of the Egyptian Revolution to the sidelines of authoritarian reconsolidation? Socioeconomic demands formed a key component of the protests of 2011 that removed the Hosni Mubarak regime, and the multi-year strikes and protests that preceded it. Despite this, political forces declared worker's issues as 'partisan' demands. Leaders characterised workers' demands as attacking a struggling state, being too narrow and threatening national unity at a time of crisis. This paper looks at how actors securitised so-called 'partisan' rhetoric following the 2011 revolution. We find that securitisation drives the content and the scope of post-revolutionary discourse.

Language: 
Country focus: 

CITATION: Stramer-Smith, Janicke. Securitising the new Egypt: Partisan vs. revolutionary demands . Oxon : Taylor & Francis Group , 2021. Journal of North African Studies,Vol. 26, No. 6, 2021, pp. 1166-1189 - Available at: https://library.au.int/frsecuritising-new-egypt-partisan-vs-revolutionary-demands