Barking Up the Wrong Tree: Why Counterterrorism Cannot Be a Defense of Democracy

Barking Up the Wrong Tree: Why Counterterrorism Cannot Be a Defense of Democracy

Author: 
Engelmann, Sabrina
Publisher: 
Taylor & Francis
Date published: 
2012
Record type: 
Journal Title: 
Democracy and Security
Source: 
Democracy & Security , Vol. 8, No. 2, April-June 2012, pp. 164-174
Abstract: 

Debates in democratic theory underestimate the dangers of confusing counterterrorism with the defense of democracy. This confusion is traced back either to the perception that terrorism constitutes a threat to the functioning of a democratic system, the similarity of measures deployed to defend democracy and to fight terrorism, or the misuse of the term “democracy.” However, terrorism is not a threat to consolidated democracies, but rather a threat to security. On the contrary, counterterrorism laws can themselves have negative effects on democracy. This confusion is hazardous and not merely a conceptual oversight, as it could justify unreviewed longer-term counterterrorism measures.

Language: 

CITATION: Engelmann, Sabrina. Barking Up the Wrong Tree: Why Counterterrorism Cannot Be a Defense of Democracy . : Taylor & Francis , 2012. Democracy & Security , Vol. 8, No. 2, April-June 2012, pp. 164-174 - Available at: https://library.au.int/barking-wrong-tree-why-counterterrorism-cannot-be-defense-democracy-3