Fanon and development: A philosophical look - pp. 71-93

This article examines concepts of limitation, theodicy, and immaturity in Fanon's ideas on development and explores how his critique unfolds in the thought of two scholars influenced by his work: Sylvia Wynner and Irene Gendzier. Wynter, working from a poeticist semiotic perspective, rejects development as a much limiter concept premised upon European normativity and calls for building an epistemological revolution. Gendzier, through a genealogical historicist critique of development studies, substantiates Wynter 's critique and argues that development studies reveals more about the First World than any others. The author then consider and issues a critique of Amartya Sen's recent effort to rescue development studies thought his formulation of development as an economy of freedom. The rest of the article presents an Africana postcolonial phenomenological treatment of freedom as a dialectical relationship between the libed reality of choices and social options and the need for a radical humanistic localism with which to fight contemporary neoliberal and conservative ones.