The Heart Of The Matter: Interpreting Bloodsucking Accusations In Mauritania
The Heart Of The Matter: Interpreting Bloodsucking Accusations In Mauritania
This article examines events involving accusations of bloodsucking in the southwestern Sahara. French colonial archives allow researchers to identify specific cases in time and location; however, this article seeks to address but then move beyond histories of colonial governance. To highlight how communities in the Saharan desert dealt with crises provoked by environmental and social change, this investigation also relies on locally-produced written legal opinions and oral testimony. Emerging from these Saharan sources is one facet of how desert communities envisioned the enchantment of their social worlds and understood difficult periods caused by famine, weak economies, and domestic tensions.
CITATION: Pettigrew, Erin. The Heart Of The Matter: Interpreting Bloodsucking Accusations In Mauritania . : Cambridge University Press , 2016. The Journal of African History, Vol. 57, No. 3, November 2016, pp. 417-435 - Available at: https://library.au.int/heart-matter-interpreting-bloodsucking-accusations-mauritania-0