Judicial Answer to the Application of a Market Level Adjuster and the Broad Construction of a Complaint under the South African Pension Funds Act
Judicial Answer to the Application of a Market Level Adjuster and the Broad Construction of a Complaint under the South African Pension Funds Act
The jurisdiction of the Adjudicator is one of the most litigated and academically debated subjects in modern South African pension law. This note adds to the debate by discussing a recent case decided by the Supreme Court of Appeal in Mungal. In this case, the court construed the Adjudicator's jurisdiction broadly and, in the process, made some important pronouncements which warrant academic commentary. This article argues that Mungal should be welcomed because it clarified that the Adjudicator has jurisdiction to determine disputes against insurers of underwritten pension fund organizations. The author maintains that, by construing the Adjudicator's jurisdiction broadly, the court empowered the Adjudicator to achieve its mandate of disposing of complaints in a procedurally fair, economical and expeditious manner, and to extend services to lay complainants.
CITATION: Mhango, Mtendeweka. Judicial Answer to the Application of a Market Level Adjuster and the Broad Construction of a Complaint under the South African Pension Funds Act . : Cambridge University Press , 2015. Journal of African Law Vol. 59, No. 2, October 2015, pp. 317-328 - Available at: https://library.au.int/judicial-answer-application-market-level-adjuster-and-broad-construction-complaint-under-south-1