Partnering for Peace: Implications and Dilemmas

Partnering for Peace: Implications and Dilemmas

Author: 
Paddon, Emily
Publisher: 
Taylor & Francis Group
Date published: 
2011
Record type: 
Journal Title: 
International Peacekeeping
Source: 
International Peacekeeping , Volume 18, Number 5, November 2011, PP.516-533
ISSN: 
1353-3312
Abstract: 

Peacekeeping is an overburdened and politically fragmented institution. To address peacekeeping's predicament the UN Department for Peacekeeping Operations' (DPKO's) ‘New Horizon’ agenda proposes to strengthen and deepen internal and external partnerships with the aim of providing rapid, robust and accepted capability-driven responses to conflict. This article explores the implications of such partnerships for peacekeeping, its core principles and the UN's legitimacy as the primary actor tasked with maintaining international peace and security. The author cautions against prioritizing external partnerships at the expense of strengthening meaningful internal partnerships, shoring up political will and clarifying vision and expectations among the Security Council, the Secretariat, member states and, in particular, troop-contributing countries.

Language: 

CITATION: Paddon, Emily. Partnering for Peace: Implications and Dilemmas . : Taylor & Francis Group , 2011. International Peacekeeping , Volume 18, Number 5, November 2011, PP.516-533 - Available at: https://library.au.int/partnering-peace-implications-and-dilemmas-3