Response to ‘High Noon for Microfinance Impact Evaluations’
Response to ‘High Noon for Microfinance Impact Evaluations’
Publisher:
Taylor & Francis
Date published:
2012
Record type:
Journal Title:
Journal of Development Studies
Source:
The Journal of Development Studies, Vol. 48, Issue 12, December 2012, pp. 1881-1885
Subject:
Abstract:
Duvendack and Palmer-Jones are critical of analysis and conclusions in Chemin (2008) because they are unable to replicate my results. This response identifies key differences between the two papers, especially regarding the sample and measurement of variables, which imply that Duvendack and Paler-Jones should not be considered as either a replication or a criticism of my work.
Language:
Catagory URL:
CITATION: Chemin, Matthieu. Response to ‘High Noon for Microfinance Impact Evaluations’ . : Taylor & Francis , 2012. The Journal of Development Studies, Vol. 48, Issue 12, December 2012, pp. 1881-1885 - Available at: https://library.au.int/response-‘high-noon-microfinance-impact-evaluations’-3