Together but separate: How Muslim scholars conceived of religious plurality in South Asia in the seventeenth century

Together but separate: How Muslim scholars conceived of religious plurality in South Asia in the seventeenth century

Author: 
Khalfoui, Mouez
Publisher: 
Taylor & Francis Group
Date published: 
2011
Record type: 
Journal Title: 
Bulletin of the school of Oriental and African studies
Source: 
Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, Vol.74, No.1, 2011, pp. 87-96
Abstract: 

The Al-Fatawa al-Hindiyya Al- Alamjiriyya is a compendium of Islamic anafi law. It was written in South Asia during the second half of the seventeenth century with the goal of filling the gap between local social reality and Islamic legal theory. In order to establish an authoritative ruling, the authors compared the views of Central Asian scholars on anafi law, like those from Balakh and Bukhara, with the opinions held by the Iraqi scholars, in particular Abu anifa and his two disciples. This paper argues that the South Asian scholars shared more similarities with their Iraqi colleagues than with the Central Asian branch of the anafi school of law, although the latter were closer to them chronologically than the Iraqi scholars. Furthermore, the South Asian scholars' “permissive” point of view regarding non-Muslim residents may be ascribed to the pressure of the social reality in South Asia, which pushed them to search for a compromise between the population's ruling Muslim minority and the non-Muslim majority.

Language: 

CITATION: Khalfoui, Mouez. Together but separate: How Muslim scholars conceived of religious plurality in South Asia in the seventeenth century . : Taylor & Francis Group , 2011. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, Vol.74, No.1, 2011, pp. 87-96 - Available at: https://library.au.int/together-separate-how-muslim-scholars-conceived-religious-plurality-south-asia-seventeenth-century-4